Tiger Powder really works


Jim

It seems that Tiger Powder actually works!! You know the story, you sprinkle the Tiger Powder around the house and if you don’t have tigers then it works. I used it here in south Texas and so far its working. No tigers.

Well now the proof is in the pudding. Even though there is not ONE case where the Patriot Act has saved us from another attack, Rick Santorum says we need to keep it because there have been no new attacks since it was passed. Even though the citizens give up their privacy, doesn’t matter, we havent had any terrorist attacks so it works. Even though it is unconstitutional. Even though there IS evidence that the Patriot Act has not prevented even ONE attack. As I said, Tiger Powder works so Rick is running on that. Do we really want to give the Presidency to a man that believes in Tiger Powder??

I like his stand “I will drive a stake through the heart of Common Core”, but I think I can find ANOTHER candidate that hates both Common Core AND the Patriot Act.

“You shall know the truth and the Truth shall set you free.”
Jim Isbell

Advertisements

Its Deja Vu all over again


Jim

“Its Deja Vu all over again.”

Am I the only one that has seen this parallel?

Maybe its because I am 78 years old so know the story of 76 years ago. While two generations later, they don’t know the story because we don’t teach real history in our schools. If we ignore history we are doomed to repeat it and in this case the parallels are so extreme that I wonder if Putin was a clone of Hitler. Lets hope he is a clone and doesn’t know how the story ended.

When Hitler decided he wanted Czechoslovakia he said that the Germans were being abused by the Czechs so he would have to go into the Sudetenland, the border areas of Czechoslovakia, to relieve their abuse. Putin says the Russians in Crimea were being abused so he wanted to take over the area in order to relieve their abuse.

In the case of Hitler, after being told he couldn’t just walk in, he then demanded elections to see if the Sudetenland wanted to be part of Germany. Putin demanded elections to see if Crimea wanted to become part of Russia. Both Hitler and Putin sent operatives into the population to stir up trouble and influence the elections. Then when Hitler was told he could have elections he then said, never mind, I am going in anyway. Putin went in AHEAD of the elections and the elections were held later.

Then Hitler swore he had no designs on the rest of Czechoslovakia. Putin is now saying he has no designs on the rest of the Ukraine.

Here is where the story will get interesting. Hitler then drove his troops through Czechoslovakia and took the nation and then promised (again) the world he was through with expansion.

The scary part is that Hitler then attacked Poland. Poland had a pact with England and France to protect each other. This drew England and France into the start of WWII.

If Putin is really Hitler reborn he will now take over the entire nation of the Ukraine.

If he then decides Poland is what he wants, Poland is a member of NATO and WWIII will begin.

All the above took place because of two weak leaders, leaders with no backbone, leaders that could have stopped the progression if they had had a set of balls.

If Neville Chamberlain, the Prime Minister of England had had the guts to stand up to Hitler there might NOT have been a Second World War.

Now we have another gutless leader, President Barak Obama who will not stand up to Putin so we may be headed into the Third World War.

I am shocked that NOT ONE person has seen and commented on this parallel. As Yogi Berra once said, “Its Deja Vu all over again.”

“You shall know the truth and the Truth shall set you free.”
Jim Isbell

Remember the Alamo and Bunkerville NV


Jim

I am thinking of making a bumper sticker that says “Remember the Alamo and Bunkerville NV”

Or maybe, “Cliven Bundy was Right and so am I”

Being legally correct and being Morally right are NOT necessarily the same thing.

The internet helped stop another Ruby Ridge or Waco from happening. But we came as close as a firecracker to having another revolution. If the Bureau of Land Management had not backed down and one shot had been fired accidentally or one firecracker lit off, 200 federal agents could have been dead and what was left of 1000 citizens would have been labeled as terrorists with nothing left to loose. Had that happened, with today’s internet, the number in that crowd would have swelled to 10,000 over night. Then what happened next, with the National Guard of Nevada at less then 10,000 strong, would have been a scary thing.

I dont think Harry Reids comment that “it is not over yet” helped to stabilize anything. The man is a fool, no, I will say that differently, he is a damned fool.

Luckily, someone at the top realized that having 200 dead federal agents and an army of pissed off citizens that was armed, outnumbered the National Guard and had “nothing left to loose”, was not a good scenario.  Yes, the National Guard has tanks, helicopters and sophisticated weapons.  But do you think the majority of them would have followed orders to fire upon their neighbors and fellow Nevadans?  I dont think they would have.  The National Guard is sworn to carry out any “legal order” from their superiors and they are carefully educated on the lessons from the Nuremberg trials.  You can swing by the neck  for following an order from your superior so you need to make that determination on your own.

If the National Guard had been called out, then that 10,000 man/woman army would have grown even faster.  There were people in that group that came all the way from Connecticut with their “illegal” assault rifles to help Cliven Bundy.  This is what the Second Amendment was designed for.  To allow the people to resist an oppressive government, just as they had at Lexington.  This time, with the Second Amendment still intact, it worked to preserve our Free nation to remain Free.  We must be constantly vigilant to preserve the Second Amendment intact and un-changed if we are to preserve our nation.

Is Bundy in the legal right under our current legal environment?  Maybe not, but that does not say that our current legal environment is right.  Is Bundy in the moral right?  The charges against him are being misrepresented, the reasons for going after him are being misrepresented, and the methods used are not justified.

First, the Bundy family has been on that range since 1875, long before the BLM even existed.  The Bundy family was legally grazing their cattle on otherwise worthless land until 1993 when the US Government decided they would charge ranchers to graze there and when Bundy said, no you wont, they withdrew his long standing grazing rights and declared him a criminal.  Thus it was not through any action of his own, but by government edict, that he became a criminal.

Second, the reason that BLM decided to go after Cliven Bundy in April of 2014, after 20+ years of court action (Courts that are owned by the US Government and therefore NOT impartial) was not to protect a Dessert Tortoise, but rather because Harry Reid  wants to build a Solar Farm on the land…..which by the way will require the Tortoise to be removed first.  Harry Reids relatives and political friends are in high places in the legal departments of the company that wants to build the Solar Farm and at BLM.  Now do you get it??

Third, since when do we use armed force to go after anyone that is not a danger to the public.  Bundy was not resisting at the point of a gun….not until his son was Tasered and his daughter tackled to the ground and then others came to his defense.  Which of us would not defend our children when tactics such as these are used?  The BLM, IRS and all other government bureaucracy’s, that are not charged with the control of violent criminals, should be DISARMED except as to their personal arms that are guaranteed by the Second Amendment.  Our taxes should not be going to pay for the arming of Government thugs.  Even the BATF agent that inspects my business (I am a Federal Firearms licensee) does not wear an open carried firearm.  He may carry concealed, but he doesnt carry openly as a threat.  Many of our current bureaucracies arm their “inspectors” just to show how large their penises are!

“You shall know the truth and the Truth shall set you free.”
Jim Isbell

The Sky Is Falling


Jim

I just read an explanation for the cold winter we have just had. Its Global Warming. No, no kidding, that is what the TV segment said.

They say the warm air in the upper atmosphere has pushed down on the poles causing the polar “vortex” (Dang, the hippies just love that word,vortex…, I wonder when they will bring in Crystals to the global warming argument?) causing the polar vortex to expand into the lower latitudes, and making the winter colder.

OK,lets give them that. I dont believe it, but I will concede the point just to prove that its not a bad thing even if it IS true.

OK, lets examine the facts. The poles are too cold for habitation by any but the most hardy and is not suitable for farming of any kind because it is too cold. So warming of the poles is BAD?? The land mass under the southern ice cap is huge.

Next, the middle latitudes like the southern United States is only suitable for farming of select, hot weather resistant crops, corn, cotton, maize, and other drought resistant crops. So cooling of these areas is BAD???

Getting hotter at the equator where the Sahara desert holds forth? Cant grow anything there anyway. So warming in the desert is BAD?

Oh yes, Australia, mostly desert, will become cooler as the southern vortex (wow, there is that word again) expands up into the more northern latitudes.

The land mass that includes much of Russia and much of India and almost all of Canada that will be improved by this “warming” will produce much more food than any small amount of land that will become less productive.

The increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will increase the growth rate of all green plants…..more food…..more food…..

The increased water vapor that is produced by this increase in vegetation will make more clouds which will make the surface of the earth more reflective thus reducing the temperature on the earth (ever notice that it is cooler on a cloudy day, I guess Al Gore never went out on a cloudy day).

This was all taught in schools in the 1950s. It was true then and it is true today.

Dont they teach that anymore, or have the global warming nazis removed logic from the curriculum of our schools.

“You shall know the truth and the Truth shall set you free.”
Jim Isbell

350 Thousand Criminals and the 3%


Jim

The start of the First American Revolution has often been tied to Lexington MA where shots were fired on April 18th, 1775 , where eight Americans were killed and a British soldier was slightly wounded.  This is not far from Connecticut where another revolution is brewing.

The Second American Revolution, as it will come to be labeled if not thwarted by astute politicians, is brewing now in Connecticut where an oppressive government is seeking to deprive its citizens of their rights under the Constitution that was established as “the law of the land” after the First American Revolution was successful.

The two revolutions will be similar in their beginnings.  Each was created by a government that had become enamored of its power.  These two governments, King George III and The Legislature of the State of Connecticut, both pressed their subjects for a long time while the revolution fermented like a bad wine.  Then when things became unbearable and the only way to relieve themselves of the title of “criminal”, the citizens began to resist that government.  The 239th anniversary of the beginning of that First revolution is fast approaching, on the 18th of April 2014.  The “350 Thousand Criminal” citizens of Connecticut are resisting NOW.

It is not yet the shot heard around the world, but as the two forces, 350,000 Americans with, government described, assault weapons face off with the Connecticut Legislature, it is approaching time for someone to blink.  Hopefully it will be the government that blinks. because it is unlikely that “350 Thousand Criminals” will blink.  They are already criminals by Connecticut law, what is to be gained by giving in?

Already the leadership and about 250 officers of the Peace Officers Association of Connecticut have stated that they WILL NOT enforce the unconstitutional law.  They are standing with the “350 Thousand Criminals”.

In the First American Revolution only 3% of the population stood against the oppressive government.  That is all it took to win the war.  In Connecticut the population is  current 3,574,097.  The “350 Thousand Criminals” represent 10% of the population of Connecticut!  They are already resisting.  If even 2 out of 3 of them will just lay down their arms.  That still leaves “The 3%”.

Extrapolating further, there are 300 million people in the united states.  There are perhaps 45 million LEGAL “assault weapons owners”.  That represents 15% of the population.  If those 15% were made “criminals” by a change in law, and even if 4 out of 5 of them lay down their arms, there would still be “The 3%”.

It is interesting that our current impotent government has told us that they cannot arrest 11 million illegal aliens because they couldn’t house them, let alone find them.  That’s less than 0.4% of the population!

How much harder would it be to arrest and house 45 million American criminals…………45 million that, unlike the illegal aliens, are armed.  Even if the entire United States Armed Forces of 450,000 were used.  They would be outnumbered 10 to 1.  An army of that size with only one in ten armed, overcame the US Army in North Korea.  All of this army would be armed.  And I doubt that the individual members of the army, who would most likely go AWOL, or the population at large would allow such a war to go on.  Leaders that supported such a war would be taken from power and “the 3%” would win.

We can only hope that the legislature of Connecticut comes to its senses before it foments the Second American Revolution

“You shall know the truth and the Truth shall set you free.”
Jim Isbell

Taxing Savings Accounts, How Dare They?


Jim

Its been a while since I posted to this blog.  Its not that everything has been going well, its just that I got depressed about the fact that I never hear any feedback so had decided that no one was listening.  But now I am mad, mad as hell, and I don’t care if anyone is listening or not.

Yesterday the news was all about the island nation of Cyprus that was
going to raid the savings accounts of their people to get the money to
bail out the country.  They called it a tax and were just going to
remove 10% out of all savings accounts.  On Fox news the talk was
about “How could they tax the “existence of money” rather than the
“making of money (income tax)?”  “How dare they do such a thing?”

Well, tell me how different that is from Property taxes?  Why is money
in the form of dirt any more taxable than money in the form of digital
paper?

As long as property taxes exist we don’t own our land, we are only
“share croppers”, we just rent our land from the government.  My
grandfather was a share cropper and my father fought tooth and nail to
lift his family out of that slavery only to once again become a share
cropper when he became a property owner.

Now his son is a share cropper.

“You shall know the truth and the Truth shall set you free.”
Jim Isbell

Gun Control will stop the School Killings


Sure it will.  Had just one of the administrators of that school been “packing” the slaughter might have been stopped much earlier.  Three administrators that rushed him were killed, had they been carrying concealed they could have shot him from a distance.  All this occurred in the 5th most strict gun control state in the 50 United States.  Now we want more gun control?  “Gun Free Zones” should be called “Unarmed Victims Zones.”  The great majority of mass killings occur in, so called, “gun free zones”.  We must eliminate gun free zones immediately, as there are no defences in such locations.  All are defenceless except the perpetrator.

Headline: 

First he killed his wife, then he killed 38 school children and 6 adults and then he committed suicide. 

Does that sound familiar?

Comments that gun control will do the job are misguided.  Do you, like many others, think that this is a new thing brought about by  so called, assault riffles?  Do you believe the hype that the worst school killing was in 2007?  You are dead wrong.  Gun control would NOT have prevented the Bath School murders.  Follows a quote from Wikipedia with the details of the Bath School Disaster in May of 1927,  86 years ago:

“The Bath School disaster is the name given to three bombings in Bath Township, Michigan, on May 18, 1927, which killed 38 elementary school children, two teachers, and four other adults; at least 58 people were injured. The perpetrator first killed his wife, and committed suicide with his last explosion. Most of the victims were children in the second to sixth grades (7–14 years of age[1]) attending the Bath Consolidated School. Their deaths constitute the deadliest mass murder in a school in United States history.[2]

The bomber was the school board treasurer Andrew Kehoe, age 55, who was angry after being defeated in the spring 1926 election for township clerk. He was thought to have planned his “murderous revenge” after that public defeat; he had a reputation for difficulty on the school board and in personal dealings. For much of the next year, a neighbor noticed Kehoe had stopped working on his farm and thought he might be planning suicide. During that period, Kehoe carried out steps in his plan to destroy the school and his farm by purchasing and hiding explosives.

Kehoe’s wife was ill with tuberculosis and he had stopped making mortgage payments; he was under pressure for foreclosure. Some time between May 16 and the morning of May 18, 1927, Kehoe murdered his wife by hitting her on the head. On the morning of May 18 about 8:45, he exploded incendiary devices in his house and farm buildings, setting them on fire and destroying them.

Almost simultaneously, an explosion devastated the north wing of the school building, killing many schoolchildren. Kehoe had used a timed detonator to ignite dynamite and hundreds of pounds of incendiary pyrotol, which he had secretly planted inside the school over the course of many months. As rescuers gathered at the school, Kehoe drove up, stopped, and used a rifle to detonate dynamite inside his shrapnel-filled truck, killing himself, the school superintendent, and several others nearby, as well as injuring more bystanders. During rescue efforts at the school, searchers discovered an additional 500 pounds (230 kg) of unexploded dynamite and pyrotol connected to a timing device and planted throughout the basement of the south wing. Kehoe had apparently intended to blow up and destroy the entire school.”

Gun control will disarm the innocent and that is no way to protect the innocent.

Can you name one downside to having properly trained adults carrying CONCEALED in a school???

“You shall know the truth and the Truth shall set you free.”
Jim Isbell

Our Motivation To Vote


Our sorry leader told us yesterday that we should vote to get revenge.  Revenge on who?  Revenge on what?  I think it is his way of saying, “Revenge on democracy and the American way of life” which he feels has wronged himself and his family in some way.   I can think of no worse motivation to vote except, perhaps, hate, which he has also proposed between the lines of his “war on women” and his racial comments.  This man is evil and is motivated by evil emotions.

We must be more civilized and we must, as Mitt Romney has said, “Vote for love of country”  We must vote because we see our country being led by an evil man that is not just misguided, but actually, has our country’s destruction on his agenda.  I don’t blame the Democrats for evil intent, just this one man.  The Democrats have been beguiled by his charisma and actually believe the lies he is presenting as “his truth”.

I think his comment yesterday that you should vote for revenge was a slip that revealed his real, evil, inner self.  He really meant it. He just didn’t mean to say it and reveal his inner agenda.

Today he said that the increase in unemployment showed that the country was coming out of the recession.  What kind of logic is that?  The last time a president was running for election with an unemployment record like that and won was in 1936.  But in 1936 while unemployment was high, the growth rate of the nation was at 11%.  Today we have the high unemployment AND less than 2% growth!  This is a recipe for financial disaster.  It was set up by our current president.

Yesterday he said that Al Queda is on the run and decimated.  While he ignores that Al Queda just killed our Libyan ambassador and three other Americans while the president stood buy and refused to send help to the embassy in a firefight. Even while they were pleading for help, the president refused to allow anyone to go to their rescue. That is the definition of evil.

The following text was copied from an email I received and it tells us how we should vote and why we should vote.  I don’t know the author so cannot give credit where it should go or I would.  In two days we will be voting and we need to vote in love for our country and to get rid of the cockroaches that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government and are eating away at our foundations, at our Constitution.  Please read the following and vote accordingly.  The second point in the following should be enough for you to vote for the Romney/Ryan ticket.

1) Take elections seriously by at least reading the ‘platform’ of the major political (Democratic and Republican) parties.  Some candidates are really good motivational speakers, and some are good debaters, but it’s their personal core beliefs and those of their political parties where one can get the best idea of their real selves.  (Listening to their political ads is most times just misleading).

2) Understand each candidate’s personal history. That is more than just listening to their words.  What has their life been?  Open and honest? Deceiving or hidden?  Trustworthy or dishonest?

3) Then VOTE.  Don’t let the 20%-to-30% OF THE VOTERS THAT DO VOTE determine what you will have to put up with for the following  2-4 years.

Our NON-PARTICIPATION, collectively,  has gotten us into the state we are now in.

“You shall know the truth and the Truth shall set you free.”
Jim Isbell

The Pundits were saying……..


Romney had to win the first debate to win the election.

Last night the fight should have been called in the third round as a TKO for Romney. It wasn’t, and the bloody battle was painful to watch as Romney pummelled Obama to a pulp. It was the referees fault for not halting the fight as Obama was obviously in way over his head. But Obama wont blame the ref. He will, however, blame someone. It sure wont be his fault. But I can state unequivocally, it wasn’t George Bushes fault.

But now, what will the Pundits say as they look for another bar to raise? There will always be ANOTHER reason why Romney cant win.

The next debates will include foreign policy as it was not touched in this one. As the Arab world burns around him, Obama will blame a movie. I wonder how that makes his friends in Hollywood feel when he talks about restrictions on film-making when it might insight riot? I wonder what George Cloony thinks about having HIS freedom of speech curtailed?

One I thing learned, as a teenager, was that a bully will always cave in if challenged. Barack was challenged last night and he caved to a Romney body punch to the stomach. Now he will try to come back. But I also learned that bully’s, having failed, will take one of two paths in the future. Either they will spend the next 6 months soul searching and trying to figure out what went wrong (he only has 30 days to do that, not six months) or they will come back blustering immediately.

Coming back blustering, angry, and on the attack will fail miserably because the Romney camp is expecting that and they have already found his weak spot, he needs a teleprompter so his puppet master can feed him the words.  Without his puppet master he hangs limp at the end of the strings just as he did last night, shoulders down and head slumped to his chest.

Fish In An Aquarium

Tags

, ,


In a fish tank there are lots of simple minded fish that don’t seem to care that they are in a prison. They swim around quietly, eating, breeding, and doing what ever fish do in a perfectly controlled environment, perfect temperature, manna from heaven once or twice a day, and we don’t worry about what they think or if they are plotting against us.

In the book “1984” there were a group of people that lived outside the city.  They were called “Proles”,  They had none of the advantages of the city, but “Big Brother” left them alone because they were no threat to him.

If there were a shark in that fish tank we would NOT leave it alone because it would threaten us.  But the fish population, as normally constituted, does not threaten us so we leave it alone.  They live in peace, even if in captivity, and we live in peace.

What the hell am I talking about??  Well, for the past four years I have been organizing TEA Party events, writing Blogs and in general trying to be a pain in the ass to the Democrats in every way I could because I fear the prison they are offering me.

But that means I am a threat to them so they perceive me as an enemy and will cause me no end of frustration and pain

So what if I became a “fish”?  I fly/swim under the RADAR, like the Proles did.  The Socialist can have their government and have fun making laws and trying to control each other.  I will “live outside the city” and do my thing.  They will not perceive of me as an enemy and they will leave me alone while sending me money and health care, etc.

If Obama wins this next election, I have been spitting into the wind. No one was listening to me. I have been frustrated and angry for four years for NOTHING.  The people in the city want a prison for themselves. I don’t like that prison, so I will make one I do like that does not interfere with theirs.